1.
Olive pomace oil can improve blood lipid profile: a randomized, blind, crossover, controlled clinical trial in healthy and at-risk volunteers.
González-Rámila, S, Sarriá, B, Seguido, MA, García-Cordero, J, Mateos, R, Bravo, L
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(2):589-603
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are increasing. It is known that a healthy diet and physical exercise can modulate the risk of CVD. In this regard, the Mediterranean Diet (MD) is considered a model of healthy eating and olive oil is an essential component of this diet, as its primary fat source. The aims of this study were to assess the possible beneficial role of consuming olive pomace oil (OPO) as the main source of fat in the diet on serum lipid concentrations (primary outcome) and other biomarkers of cardiovascular health such as blood pressure, endothelial function and inflammation (secondary outcomes) in at-risk (hypercholesterolaemic) subjects. This study was a randomised, blind, crossover, controlled clinical trial in free-living subjects. Participants, men and women aged 18–55 years, were randomly assigned to one of the two groups; normocholesterolaemic or hypercholesterolaemic group. Results showed that consumption of OPO for four weeks resulted in an improved blood lipid profile, decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Apo B and low-density lipoprotein/ high-density lipoprotein ratio both in healthy and at-risk volunteers, in contrast to the opposite effect observed with high-oleic acid sunflower oil (HOSO), with no significant changes in other CVD risk factors. Furthermore, no changes were observed in relation to blood pressure, and biomarkers linked to inflammation and endothelial function. Authors conclude that OPO could have hypolipidemic actions in healthy consumers and in subjects with high blood cholesterol, contributing to cardiovascular disease prevention.
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the effect of dietary consumption of olive pomace oil (OPO) on blood lipids (primary outcome) and other cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (blood pressure, inflammation and endothelial function as secondary outcomes). METHODS A randomized, controlled, blind, crossover intervention was carried out in healthy and at-risk (hypercholesterolemic) subjects. Participants consumed daily 45 g of OPO or high-oleic acid sunflower oil (HOSO) as control oil during 4 weeks. RESULTS OPO significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; P = 0.003) and apolipoprotein B (Apo B; P = 0.022) serum concentrations, and LDL/HDL ratio (P = 0.027) in healthy and at-risk volunteers. These effects were not observed with HOSO. Blood pressure, peripheral artery tonometry (PAT), endothelial function and inflammation biomarkers were not affected. CONCLUSIONS Regular consumption of OPO in the diet could have hypolipidemic actions in subjects at cardiovascular risk as well as in healthy consumers, contributing to CVD prevention. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NCT04997122, August 8, 2021, retrospectively registered.
2.
Impact of Replacement of Individual Dietary SFAs on Circulating Lipids and Other Biomarkers of Cardiometabolic Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Humans.
Sellem, L, Flourakis, M, Jackson, KG, Joris, PJ, Lumley, J, Lohner, S, Mensink, RP, Soedamah-Muthu, SS, Lovegrove, JA
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2022;13(4):1200-1225
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, and metabolic disorders such as diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, and hypertension contribute to this risk. Cardiometabolic disease (CMD) can be reduced by reducing saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and replacing them with unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs). Dietary SFA's are classified as a whole group in general dietary guidelines. However, blood lipid levels and other biomarkers of CMD may be affected differently by individual dietary SFAs. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 44 randomised controlled trials were included that investigated the effects of replacing SFAs with individual dietary SFAs or UFAs on markers of CMD. CMD markers like Total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol, and apoB concentrations were significantly reduced by replacing 1.5%TE of palmitic acid with oleic acid or UFAs for 14 days. The research also showed associations between apoB and LDL-cholesterol and apoA-I and HDL-cholesterol concentrations. Dietary palmitic acid substituted with UFAs significantly reduced fasting LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol. The majority of studies included in this study focused on dietary palmitic acid and not much on stearic acid, myristic acid, or lauric acid. Therefore, further robust studies are required to assess the effect of individual dietary SFAs on the markers of CMD, including markers of inflammation, hemostasis, glycemic control, or metabolic hormones. Healthcare professionals can use this study to understand the benefits of substituting SFAs with UFAs on CMD markers.
Abstract
Little is known of the impact of individual SFAs and their isoenergetic substitution with other SFAs or unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) on the prevention of cardiometabolic disease (CMD). This systematic literature review assessed the impact of such dietary substitutions on a range of fasting CMD risk markers, including lipid profile, markers of glycemic control and inflammation, and metabolic hormone concentrations. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the effect of isoenergetic replacements of individual dietary SFAs for ≥14 d on ≥1 CMD risk markers in humans. Searches of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases on 14 February, 2021 identified 44 RCTs conducted in participants with a mean ± SD age of 39.9 ± 15.2 y. Studies' risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for RCTs. Random-effect meta-analyses assessed the effect of ≥3 similar dietary substitutions on the same CMD risk marker. Other dietary interventions were described in qualitative syntheses. We observed reductions in LDL-cholesterol concentrations after the replacement of palmitic acid (16:0) with UFAs (-0.36 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.50, -0.21 mmol/L; I2 = 96.0%, n = 18 RCTs) or oleic acid (18:1n-9) (-0.16 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.28, -0.03 mmol/L; I2 = 89.6%, n = 9 RCTs), with a similar impact on total cholesterol and apoB concentrations. No effects on other CMD risk markers, including HDL-cholesterol, triacylglycerol, glucose, insulin, or C-reactive protein concentrations, were evident. Similarly, we found no evidence of a benefit from replacing dietary stearic acid (18:0) with UFAs on CMD risk markers (n = 4 RCTs). In conclusion, the impact of replacing dietary palmitic acid with UFAs on lipid biomarkers is aligned with current public health recommendations. However, owing to the high heterogeneity and limited studies, relations between all individual SFAs and biomarkers of cardiometabolic health need further confirmation from RCTs. This systematic review was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ as CRD42020084241.
3.
Association between plasma fatty acids and inflammatory markers in patients with and without insulin resistance and in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, a cross-sectional study.
Bersch-Ferreira, ÂC, Sampaio, GR, Gehringer, MO, Torres, EAFDS, Ross-Fernandes, MB, da Silva, JT, Torreglosa, CR, Kovacs, C, Alves, R, Magnoni, CD, et al
Nutrition journal. 2018;17(1):26
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
It is known that people with cardiovascular disease (CVD) have increased inflammation and raised levels of circulating inflammatory molecules. The presence of insulin resistance is thought to increase these levels, as are certain fatty acids coming from dietary fats. The aims of this cross-sectional study were to compare the levels of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with CVD with and without insulin resistance, and to evaluate the possible link between the blood levels of fatty acids and inflammatory biomarkers among these patients. The authors concluded that the CVD patients with insulin resistance had a higher concentration of some inflammatory molecules in the blood than those without insulin resistance. They also observed that saturated fatty acids were linked to higher levels of inflammatory molecules in the blood, while unsaturated fatty acids correlated with lower levels.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proinflammatory biomarkers levels are increased among patients with cardiovascular disease, and it is known that both the presence of insulin resistance and diet may influence those levels. However, these associations are not well studied among patients with established cardiovascular disease. Our objective is to compare inflammatory biomarker levels among cardiovascular disease secondary prevention patients with and without insulin resistance, and to evaluate if there is any association between plasma fatty acid levels and inflammatory biomarker levels among them. METHODS In this cross-sectional sub-study from the BALANCE Program Trial, we collected data from 359 patients with established cardiovascular disease. Plasma fatty acids and inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), adiponectin, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha) were measured. Biomarkers and plasma fatty acid levels of subjects across insulin resistant and not insulin resistant groups were compared, and general linear models were used to examine the association between plasma fatty acids and inflammatory biomarkers. RESULTS Subjects with insulin resistance had a higher concentration of hs-CRP (p = 0.002) and IL-6 (p = 0.002) than subjects without insulin resistance. Among subjects without insulin resistance there was a positive association between stearic fatty acid and IL-6 (p = 0.032), and a negative association between alpha-linolenic fatty acid and pro-inflammatory biomarkers (p < 0.05). Among those with insulin resistance there was a positive association between monounsaturated fatty acids and arachidonic fatty acid and adiponectin (p < 0.05), and a negative association between monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids and pro-inflammatory biomarkers (p < 0.05), as well as a negative association between polyunsaturated fatty acids and adiponectin (p < 0.05). Our study has not found any association between hs-CRP and plasma fatty acids. CONCLUSIONS Subjects in secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease with insulin resistance have a higher concentration of hs-CRP and IL-6 than individuals without insulin resistance, and these inflammatory biomarkers are positively associated with saturated fatty acids and negatively associated with unsaturated fatty acids.
4.
Olive oil intake is inversely related to cancer prevalence: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of 13,800 patients and 23,340 controls in 19 observational studies.
Psaltopoulou, T, Kosti, RI, Haidopoulos, D, Dimopoulos, M, Panagiotakos, DB
Lipids in health and disease. 2011;10:127
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dietary fat, both in terms of quality and quantity, has been implicated in cancer development, either positively or negatively. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies (13,800 cancer patients; 23,340 controls) was to evaluate whether raw olive oil intake was associated with various types of cancer. Overall, the authors concluded that olive oil consumption was associated with lower odds of cancer development. The most prominent results were observed for breast cancer and cancer of the digestive tract. The authors call for more studies to investigate whether higher olive oil intake facilitates higher vegetable intake, thus maximising potential beneficial effects on cancer prevention and whether it is the mono-unsaturated fat component of olive oil or the anti-oxidant components that are responsible for the beneficial effects. Nutrition practitioners may want to incorporate olive oil intake into their client protocols as a preventative health measure.
Abstract
Dietary fat, both in terms of quantity and quality, has been implicated to cancer development, either positively or negatively. The aim of this work was to evaluate whether olive oil or monounsaturated fat intake was associated with the development of cancer. A systematic search of relevant studies, published in English, between 1990 and March 1, 2011, was performed through a computer-assisted literature tool (i.e., Pubmed). In total 38 studies were initially allocated; of them 19 case-control studies were finally studied (13800 cancer patients and 23340 controls were included). Random effects meta-analysis was applied in order to evaluate the research hypothesis. It was found that compared with the lowest, the highest category of olive oil consumption was associated with lower odds of having any type of cancer (log odds ratio = -0.41, 95%CI -0.53, -0.29, Cohran's Q = 47.52, p = 0.0002, I-sq = 62%); the latter was irrespective of the country of origin (Mediterranean or non-Mediterranean). Moreover, olive oil consumption was associated with lower odds of developing breast cancer (logOR = -0,45 95%CI -0.78 to -0.12), and a cancer of the digestive system (logOR = -0,36 95%CI -0.50 to -0.21), compared with the lowest intake. The strength and consistency of the findings states a hypothesis about the protective role of olive oil intake on cancer risk. However, it is still unclear whether olive oil's monounsaturated fatty acid content or its antioxidant components are responsible for its beneficial effects.